A Treaty in Tatters – Why the Plastics Treaty Failed and What It Means for UK Industry

Blog Post by Rebecca Pow, Co-Chair of the EIA Climate Change Group, and former DEFRA Environment Minister

The collapse of the UN Global Plastics Treaty negotiations in Geneva marks a critical failure in the global fight against plastic pollution. As Co-Chair of the Environmental Industries Association (EIA) Climate Change Group, I am deeply concerned by the lack of progress and the implications this has for the UK’s environmental leadership and industrial innovation.   In my previous role as Environment Minister I was on the front line of negotiations back in 2024 and the UK was a key player in a group of over 80 countries pushing for high ambition for this treaty which included setting targets to cap production with the ultimate aim of reducing harm form plastic pollution by 2040 .  However, despite extra time being given for the negotiations, a year on, the talks are in tatters and the consequences are serious.

The treaty was designed to be the first legally binding international agreement to address plastic pollution across its entire lifecycle—from production to disposal. It aimed to:

  • Cap global plastic production
  • Phase out toxic chemicals in plastics
  • Promote sustainable design and circular economy models
  • Standardise Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) policies globally

Instead, the negotiations ended in stalemate, with petrochemical-producing nations—such as Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the U.S.—blocking consensus and pushing for a diluted treaty focused solely on waste management.

Michael Lunn, CEO of the Environmental Industries Association, voiced his disappointment:
“This treaty was our best chance to create a unified global framework to curb plastic pollution. Its failure is a setback not just for the environment, but for UK businesses striving to innovate in sustainable materials and circular economy models.”

The Scale of the Crisis

The statistics are sobering:

  • Global plastic waste generation has surged to 360 million metric tons per year, projected to double by 2040.
  • Globally over half of all plastic waste ends up in landfill.
  • The UK alone produces over 5 million tonnes of plastic annually, with only 9% effectively recycled.
  • One of EIA’s Members has quoted that Microplastics have been found in 100% of UK canal sediment samples they have analysed, by EIA Member SOCOTEC UK & Ireland report “Building Trust for a Safer and Sustainable World”
  • The economic cost of plastic pollution is estimated at £2.5 trillion annually, with losses in fisheries, tourism, agriculture, and healthcare
  • The plastics industry is projected to consume 20% of global oil and contribute 15% of global carbon emissions by 2050.

‘A recent report in The Lancet medical journal stated that “plastics are a grave, growing, and under-recognised danger to human and planetary health”. Writing ahead of the Geneva summit, the University of Edinburgh’s Cat Acheson, Alice Street and Rob Ralston, warned: “Plastics, the evidence shows, are a threat to human health – from womb to grave. They’re linked to miscarriages, birth defects, heart disease and cancer.”’

The report highlights that more than 16,000 chemicals are used in plastic, many of which are not disclosed by the companies making it.  Of the 16,000 chemicals safety data is lacking on over 10,000 and 4,200 are known to be chemicals of concern.

Environmental Industries Association (EIA) Member Paul Walker, Senior Technical & Development Specialist who contributed to Building Trust for a Safer and Sustainable World, (SOCOTEC UK & Ireland) who also sits on BSI EH4 Committee – focusing on British Standards in soil, highlights the alarming scale of microplastic contamination:

“Our monitoring shows microplastics are now present in every environmental matrix we test—air, water, sediment. The sheer ubiquity is staggering. We’re finding particles in places once thought pristine. This isn’t just pollution—it’s infiltration.”

British Standards committees are important in informing future plastics policy.  The committee, operating under the water standards criterion EH/3/6 and EH/3/2 UK input into the global microplastics work programme.  The committee focuses on developing robust, scientifically sound standards for detecting and monitoring microplastics in various water sources—including domestic water, freshwater, seawater, treated and untreated wastewater. These standards are essential for improving accuracy and reliability in sampling methods and enabling long-term environmental monitoring. They also ensure consistency and comparability across organizations and countries and as such the committee plays a key role in supporting policy development and water treatment innovation.  All of this is vital to forging a sustainable way forward in our plastic world.

Why the Treaty Failed

The breakdown stemmed from irreconcilable differences over ambition. While nearly 90 countries supported production caps and chemical bans, a small bloc of oil-producing nations refused to compromise. The consensus-based negotiation model allowed any country to veto progress, and that power was used repeatedly to stall meaningful action.

Implications for UK Industry

UK businesses have invested heavily in sustainable alternatives, recycling infrastructure, and product redesigns. As Waste and Recycling Minister I oversaw the introduction of the 5p carrier bag charge which saw a 97% drop in plastic carrier bag use.  A ban on a wide range of single use plastics was also introduced from plastic cups, to balloon sticks and stirrers; legislation was also passed banning microplastics in wash off care and cosmetic products and in wet wipes. And crucially the new Extended Producer responsibility scheme is focussing on packaging initially as this is the largest source of plastic.  It is aimed at reducing the overall amount of plastic coming to market in the UK and instilling greater emphasis on longer life, reuse and recyclability.  So, some major strides have been made in the UK but there is so much more to do and this issue needs a global approach in order to be meaningful.

Without a unified global framework, these efforts risk being undermined by inconsistent standards and continued market dominance of cheap, fossil-based plastics.

As Michael Lunn noted,
“UK companies are ready to lead the transition to a circular plastics economy. But they need clarity, consistency, and global cooperation to thrive.”

EIA’s Next Steps

Despite the treaty’s failure, the EIA is not standing still. We are launching a renewed strategy to:

  1. Strengthen domestic legislation: Advocate for stricter UK laws on plastic production and chemical safety.
  2. Support innovation: Partner with industry to accelerate development of non-toxic, reusable, and recyclable materials.
  3. Build coalitions: Work with like-minded nations to form a “coalition of the willing” that implements treaty elements at national and regional levels.
  4. Empower communities: Promote indigenous and frontline community-led solutions to plastic pollution.
  5. Hold polluters accountable: Push for mandatory EPR schemes and transparency in plastic supply chains.

A Call to Action

It is critical that we do not let this failure stall our momentum. The UK must continue to lead by example, pushing for ambitious national policies and working with like-minded nations to build a coalition for action.

The plastics treaty may be in tatters, but the fight against plastic pollution is far from over. The EIA calls on policymakers, industry leaders, and civil society to redouble efforts. We need stronger domestic legislation, incentives for sustainable innovation, and international partnerships that bypass obstruction and deliver real change.

Let this be a turning point—not of despair, but of determination.

Blog Post by Rebecca Pow, Co-Chair of the EIA Climate Change Group, and former DEFRA Environment Minister

EIA responds to Spending Review

EIA Raises Concerns Over DEFRA Cuts and Potential Delays to Environmental Permitting

London, 12 June 2025 — The Environment Industries Association (EIA) today voiced serious concerns over the implications of recent funding decisions for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), warning that budget cuts could lead to further delays in environmental permitting and licensing processes managed by the Environment Agency.

Following the Chancellor’s Spending Review announcement yesterday, the EIA policy team have been closely analysing the details behind the headline figures. While the review outlines long-term investments in infrastructure—including rail, nuclear, carbon capture, NHS, and housing—these projects are unlikely to deliver immediate economic growth. This concern is underscored by today’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) report showing a 0.3% contraction in the UK’s economy.

Michael Lunn, CEO to the Environmental Industries Association stated “While we welcome the government’s commitment to long-term infrastructure, the lack of short-term support for business and specifically the Environmental Services and Technology Sector and continued constraints on specialist environmental consultancy spending are troubling”.

“The Chancellor is clearly banking on future growth, but the timeline for returns is uncertain—and the risk of further tax measures in the Autumn Budget remain high”.

Buried within the 128-page Spending Review document, the EIA has identified specific concerns regarding DEFRA’s financial settlement. Although DEFRA is set to receive £7.4 billion in total funding by 2028–29, and £16 billion in capital funding over the review period (representing an average real-terms growth rate of 2.5% per year), this comes with a mandate to deliver at least 5% in savings and efficiencies during Phase 2 of the review.

These savings include £144 million in technical efficiencies identified through the Zero-Based Review (ZBR), and a shift toward increasing in-house digital capabilities to reduce reliance on external contractors. While digital transformation is welcome, the EIA warns that such measures must not come at the expense of timely and effective environmental regulation.

To meet these financial targets, DEFRA will explore a range of cost-saving measures, including the integration of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. With rapid advancements in AI capabilities, the department is assessing which operational workloads—such as data entry, support services, analytical functions, and communication roles—could be enhanced or replaced by automation.

AI systems offer significant potential to improve efficiency through faster data processing, streamlined communication, and reduced administrative overheads. Technologies such as AI-native languages, including Gibber Link, enable machines to exchange and interpret data at unprecedented speeds, offering a transformative opportunity for internal operations.

While AI cannot replace all human-led tasks—particularly those requiring in-person research and fieldwork—it can support the department by accelerating data interpretation and publication, ultimately reducing wage costs and enhancing service delivery.

In parallel, DEFRA is reviewing its permitting and licensing frameworks. Many current processes are seen as overly complex and time-consuming. By redesigning these systems, the department aims to reduce administrative burdens, improve user accessibility, and lower operational costs.

However, DEFRA acknowledges the potential risks associated with regulatory relaxation. Looser controls could lead to increased environmental degradation, including higher emissions, waste, and habitat destruction. The department remains committed to balancing efficiency with its core mission: protecting green spaces, promoting soil health, supporting agricultural productivity, and conserving wildlife.

Peter Atchison, Chair of the Remediation of Land Working Group stated that “Delays in permitting and licensing not only hinder environmental protection but also stall investment and innovation in the green economy. We urge the government to ensure that cost-cutting within DEFRA does not compromise the Environment Agency’s ability to deliver on its critical responsibilities.”

The EIA will continue to monitor developments and engage with DEFRA and other stakeholders to advocate for a balanced approach that supports both fiscal responsibility and environmental stewardship.

Flood Defence Funding

  • The government has committed £4.2 billion in Total Departmental Expenditure Limit (TDEL) over the period 2026–27 to 2028–29 specifically for flood defence infrastructure.
  • This represents a 5% annual increase in the flood defence budget, aimed at protecting communities across England from increasing flood risks due to climate change and extreme weather events.

Nature-Based Solutions and Reservoirs

  • While there is no direct mention of new reservoir construction in the Spending Review, the funding strategy includes nature-based solutions that may indirectly support water storage and flood mitigation.
  • DEFRA’s broader capital funding of £16 billion over the review period includes investments in sustainable farming, nature recovery, and environmental resilience, which are often linked to catchment-based flood management and wetland restoration.

DEFRA Operational Budget

  • Despite capital investment increases, DEFRA’s day-to-day spending will decrease in real terms—from £4.8 billion in 2025–26 to £4.7 billion by 2028–29, a 2.7% annual reduction.
  • This may place pressure on staffing and operational delivery, even as capital projects expand.

But there were some winners:

The government will invest in the critical national infrastructure needed to connect this country‘s cities and towns. The settlement will provide £10.2 billion for rail enhancements (excluding HS2) over Phase 2, including:

  • £3.5 billion to drive delivery of the TransPennine Route Upgrade, improving connectivity and reducing journey times between Manchester and Leeds, from 55 to 41 minutes. This will be delivered by the early 2030s;
  • Continued delivery of East-West Rail with £2.5 billion investment to provide new connectivity and unlocking growth across the Oxford-Cambridge corridor;
  • £300 million for rail investment in Wales, including for the Burns Review stations, North Wales Level Crossing, Padeswood Sidings and Cardiff West Junction. This SR and the upcoming 10-year Infrastructure Strategy will recognise Wales’ long-term infrastructure needs and will deliver at least £445 million of rail enhancements to realise them;
  • Funding to progress the next stage of Midlands Rail Hub West, strengthening connections from Birmingham across the West Midlands and to other regions.
  • £25.3 billion is provided under this settlement to progress delivery of HS2 from Birmingham Curzon Street to London Euston. This funding will support the full reset of the HS2 programme under the leadership of the new Chief Executive, addressing longstanding delivery challenges.

Angela Rayner’s department emerged as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the Spending Review, despite a challenging fiscal environment:

  • Capital Investment:
    The department secured £39 billion in grants over the next 10 years to support new housing developments. This funding will be distributed among local authorities, private developers, and housing associations to accelerate housebuilding and regeneration efforts. However, with the current skills shortages the delivery of spades in the ground will be challenged in the short term.
  • Day-to-Day Spending:
    Despite the capital boost, the department faces average annual cuts of 1.4% in its day-to-day operational budget from 2025–26 to 2028–29. The total settlement for this period is £16.7 billion
  • Policy Focus:
    The funding is intended to support Rayner’s ambitions to revitalise local communities, expand affordable housing, and devolve more powers to local governments. However, the operational cuts may challenge the delivery of frontline services unless offset by efficiency gains. This may lead to Councils turning to the need to uplift their local Council precepts to balance Council budgets.

Local Government and Devolution

  • The Spending Review includes a renewed focus on regional rebalancing, with significant infrastructure investments directed toward Northern and the Midlands regions.
  • Local transport projects, such as tram expansions in Manchester and Birmingham and upgrades to the Tyne and Wear Metro, are part of a broader strategy to stimulate regional growth

Sunil Shah, Chair of the EIA Sustainable Buildings Working Group said

“We welcome the Government’s £13.2 billion commitment to home decarbonisation through the fully funded Warm Homes Plan”

This initiative represents a vital step forward in delivering warmer, more energy-efficient homes, reducing household bills, and addressing the climate crisis. Last week’s announcement that all new homes in England will be equipped with renewable energy as standard was a significant milestone. Yesterday’s announcement builds on that momentum, offering much-needed certainty for both industry and consumers.

By supporting the rollout of low-carbon technologies, including retrofitting, the Warm Homes Plan will help accelerate the UK’s transition to a cleaner, more sustainable future. We look forward to reviewing the full details of the plan in due course.”

Jim Mills, Chair of the EIA Air Quality Working Group expressed disappointment that Air Quality did not feature significantly with only one mention, however, that was in the context of agricultural impacts presumably linked to methane emissions.

For more information please contact:

Environment Industries Association (EIA)
Membership@EIAssociation.co.uk
www.EIAssociation.co.uk

Environmental Industries Association | LinkedIn

EIA Launches *New* Working Group on Environmental Noise

London, UK – 5 June 2025 – The Environmental Industries Association (EIA), the leading voice for the UK’s environmental services technology and services sector, is proud to announce the formation of a new Environmental Noise Working Group. This initiative underscores the EIA’s commitment to addressing the growing challenges and opportunities surrounding environmental noise pollution across the UK.

The Environmental Noise Working Group will bring together experts from industry, academia, and government to explore innovative solutions, influence policy, and promote best practices in noise measurement, assessment, mitigation, and regulation. With urbanisation, infrastructure development, and transportation networks expanding rapidly, the need for coordinated action on environmental noise has never been more urgent.

Key objectives of the working group include:

  • Policy Engagement: Collaborating with regulators and policymakers to shape effective noise control legislation and standards.
  • Innovation and Technology: Promoting the adoption of cutting-edge noise management, assessment and abatement technologies.
  • Public Awareness: Raising awareness of the health and environmental impacts of noise pollution.
  • Industry Collaboration: Creating a platform for EIA members to share knowledge, case studies, and technical expertise.

Giles Parker, Sound Barrier Solutions who has offered to chair the working group said “We are excited to launch this new working group at a time when environmental noise is gaining recognition as a critical public health and environmental issue,” at the EIA. “This group will play a vital role in ensuring that the UK remains at the forefront of sustainable and responsible environmental management.”

The Environmental Noise Working Group will hold its inaugural meeting in next month, with participation open to all EIA members and invited guests and stakeholders.

For more information or to express interest in joining the group, please visit: https://eiassociation.co.uk/policy/environmental-noise/

Environmental Industries Association Announces Appointment of Rebecca Pow as Co-Chair of Climate Change Working Group

London, June 6th, 2025 – The Environmental Industries Association (EIA) is pleased to announce the appointment of Rebecca Pow, former Environment Minister to DEFRA and author of the Environment Act, as Co-Chair of the EIA Climate Change Working Group.

Peter Atchison, Chairman of the EIA, expressed his enthusiasm for Rebecca Pow's new role, stating, "It is fantastic that Rebecca has agreed to help Chair EIA's Climate Change Working Group. Her extensive experience and impressive track record in the environment sector will be invaluable as we debate the challenges of delivery in a changing global world."

Rebecca Pow brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to the EIA. As a former Environment Minister and author of the Environment Act, she has been instrumental in shaping environmental policy in the UK. Her appointment as Co-Chair of the Climate Change Working Group underscores the EIA's commitment to addressing climate change and promoting sustainable practices.

Rebecca Pow commented on her new role, saying, "I am very pleased to be joining the work of the Environmental Industries Association. I look forward to working with Members to create a new narrative around climate change and what it means for UK business. Together, we can drive meaningful change and ensure a sustainable future."

The EIA's Climate Change Working Group will focus on debating and addressing the challenges of climate change in a rapidly evolving global landscape. With Rebecca Pow's leadership, the group aims to develop innovative solutions and strategies to support UK businesses in their efforts to combat climate change. The first meeting will be confirmed in the next few weeks and will be held in the House of Commons. EIA Members will have opportunity to direct debate the issues with leading decision makers and academic leaders.

EIA meets with the Earl of Lindsay, Chairman of UKAS to discuss opportunities and challenges of the UK Environmental Laboratory Sector

Environmental Industries Association meets with the Earl of Lindsay, Chairman of UKAS in the House of Lord to discuss opportunities and challenges of the UK Environmental Laboratory Sector

Westminster – May 13, 2025 – A leading delegation from the Environmental Industries Association (EIA) attended the House of Lords this morning to meeting with the Earl of Lindsay, Chairman of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS), to discuss the opportunities and challenges facing the UK Environmental Laboratory Sector. This meeting brought together a delegation of EIA Environmental Laboratories to showcase their exceptional work in various fields, including soil and water analysis, PFAS analysis, microplastics investigation, asbestos testing, hydrocarbons, coal tar, and food hygiene.

Dr. Ken Scally, Chair of the EIA Environmental Analysis and Testing Group, expressed his enthusiasm for the meeting: "The UK Environmental Labs sector is doing truly amazing work that often goes unrecognised. This meeting is a fantastic opportunity to highlight the significant contributions our EIA members make to the UK economy and to government priorities, such as the Deputy Prime Minister's manifesto commitment to build 1.5 million homes, many of which are on brownfield or greybelt sites."

The UK laboratories sector is a vital part of the UK economy, generating £108.1 billion in turnover and employing 304,200 people across the country. Many EIA members also work internationally, bringing their expertise to global markets.

The EIA Environmental Analysis and Testing Working Group represents the most advanced and leading environmental laboratories and consultants within the UK. The group meets four times a year with guest speakers from government and industry stakeholders to focus on pressing policy and regulatory issues, fostering a collaborative environment where members can raise concerns and discuss solutions to help growth within the sector.

A key aspect of the EIA's work is its relationship with UKAS. UKAS accreditation is crucial for ensuring the quality and reliability of testing and analysis services. It provides a globally recognised, peer-reviewed, and government-endorsed process that adds significant value to operations. Accreditation by UKAS demonstrates the EIA's commitment to quality, competence, and transparency, helping members meet specific standards required by various markets and opportunities.

The EIA has already established positive dialogue with UKAS and is extremely grateful for this meeting, which is seen as an opportunity to build on existing work and support UKAS further. Collaboration and mutual support are essential for advancing shared goals in environmental analysis and testing. The EIA looks forward to exploring opportunities for cooperation and working together to achieve excellence in the field.

EIA attendees include:

  • Dr. Ken Scally, Normec DETS, Chairman of EIA Environmental Analysis and Testing Working Group
  • Dr. Claire Stone, i2 Analytical Ltd
  • Bogna Tyc, Element
  • Geraint Pumford, Socotec
  • Lucy Chisholm, Eurofins
  • Hazel Davidson, Element
  • Karolina Pettit, Veritas Laboratory Services Ltd
  • Michael Lunn, CEO, Environmental Industries Association

UKAS representative:

  • Lynsey Poyner, Operations Director, UKAS

Environmental Industries Association Responds to Rachel Reeves’ Spring Statement

Westminster, London, 26 March 2025 – The Environmental Industries Association (EIA) raises concerns over the reduction in growth which is now projected to grow by 1.0 per cent in 2025, half the 2.0 per cent assumed in October budget but welcomes the Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Spring Statement in keeping the Government within the fiscal rules set by the Chancellor. However, the EIA expresses significant concerns over the proposed cuts to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and subsequently the Environment Agency expected in June as part of the Spending Review, as well as the ongoing impact of the increase in employers' National Insurance contributions.

Growth in the Green Economy

The EIA is encouraged by the Chancellor's commitment to fostering growth, but failed to mention the important contribution that UK environmental services and technology sector. The transition towards sustainable energy systems and environmentally sustainable economic growth is crucial for achieving the UK's climate goals and creating new job opportunities in sectors such as renewable energy, green agriculture, and sustainable forestry. The EIA supports initiatives that drive investment in green technologies and infrastructure, which are essential for a resilient and sustainable future.

EIA raises concerns over DEFRA and Environment Agency cuts

However, the EIA is deeply concerned about the announced cuts to DEFRA and the Environment Agency. These cuts threaten to undermine the progress made in environmental protection and conservation efforts. The reduction in funding could lead to job losses and hinder the ability of these agencies to effectively manage and protect the UK's natural resources.

The EIA urges the government to reconsider these cuts and prioritize funding for environmental protection to ensure the continued health and sustainability of our ecosystems.

Impact of Employers' National Insurance Increase remains a concern for business

The increase in employers' National Insurance contributions in the Autumn Budget from 13.8% to 15.0%, along with the reduction in the contribution threshold, continues to pose a significant challenge for businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This increase in operational costs may deter job creation, reduction in investment, leading to salary freezes, and potentially result in redundancies. The EIA calls on the government to provide additional support to businesses to mitigate these impacts and ensure that the environmental economy can continue to grow and thrive.

Proposal for VAT Reduction

To further support business growth and stimulate the green economy, the EIA suggests a reduction in Value Added Tax (VAT) for the Environmental Services and Technology Sector to aid green growth economy. Lowering VAT would reduce the cost of goods and services, encouraging investment and consumption in the environmental services and technology sector. This measure would not only benefit businesses but also promote sustainable practices and help the UK achieve its environmental targets.

Peter Atchison, Chairman of the Environmental Industries Association, stated, "The chief moral obligation of the Government is to build a sustainable economy that is strong enough to lift people out of poverty. Introducing cuts to an already under resourced DEFRA and Environment Agency is a backward step. These cuts will further undermine confidence and regulatory enforcement which helps to drive green growth and supports thousands of jobs in the environmental sector.

Conclusion

The EIA remains committed to working with the government to promote a sustainable and prosperous green economy. We urge the Chancellor to consider the long-term benefits of investing in environmental protection and to take steps to support businesses during this transition. Together, we can build a sustainable and more resilient future for the UK.

EIA celebrates National Apprenticeship Week 2025

EIA celebrates National Apprenticeship Week 2025: Celebrating the Impact of Apprenticeships

Join us in celebrating the 18th annual #NationalApprenticeshipWeek (NAW) from 10 to 16 February 2025!

National Apprenticeship Week 2025 is a time to recognise the profound impact of apprenticeships, providing individuals with valuable skills and experiences to forge successful careers. These programs not only bridge skills gaps in the environmental and consultancy sector but also drive business growth and aid in economic recovery.

The #EnvironmentalIndustriesAssociation (EIA) www.EIAssociation.co.uk proudly acknowledges its EIA members for their pivotal role in fostering apprenticeships within the Environmental Services and Technology sector. Leading #environmental #consultants, #innovative #technology firms, and #publicbodies associated with the EIA are dedicated to delivering top-notch apprenticeship initiatives. These programs offer hands-on training in crucial areas like Brownfield development, Environmental Science, Air Quality monitoring, water management, ecological consultancy, environmental management, and sustainable technology development.

STATOM Group Ltd, one of our founding Members, actively supports Apprenticeships for a "greener and sustainable future". Michael Gillman, Group Environmental Manager said, "As a founding member of the Environmental Industries Association, Statom Remediation is committed to shaping a sustainable future by fostering the next generation of #environmental #professionals. By championing #apprenticeships, we’re equipping young talent with the skills and hands-on experience they need to excel in the ever-evolving #environmentalsector."

"Apprenticeships are essential for developing expertise in vital environmental fields and play a crucial role in driving innovation and sustainability. At #StatomRemediation, we believe in investing in both people and the planet. Our support for apprenticeships ensures that the industry continues to grow with a fresh wave of dedicated, skilled professionals prepared to tackle the environmental challenges of tomorrow".

Through collaboration and opportunity, we’re helping to cultivate a future where knowledge, passion, and environmental stewardship intersect for lasting change. Investing in the future of environmental services is paramount for the EIA Members. By offering diverse apprenticeship opportunities, EIA members are cultivating a skilled workforce capable of addressing future environmental challenges. These apprenticeships impart technical expertise and instill a profound understanding of environmental issues and sustainable practices. The EIA is proud all its Members supporting Apprenticeships across the industry.

For more information in joining EIA and its wider network go to www.EIAssociation.co.uk/Membership

Credit: STATOM Group Ltd

EIA Responds to Rachel Reeves’ Speech on Economic Growth and Infrastructure Delivery

The Environmental Industries Association (EIA) has welcomed the recent announcement by the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves (Oxford, January 29, 2025) on economic growth and the delivery of critical infrastructure. Michael Lunn, CEO of the EIA, expressed both optimism and a word of warning regarding the proposed measures.

"We welcome the announcement and the focus on economic growth," said Michael Lunn. "However, we have significant concerns that the environmental impacts of the schemes announced are not compromised. It is crucial that growth does not come at the expense of protecting our environment. Environmental sustainability and economic growth can and must work together."

The EIA emphasises the importance of integrating clean, innovative, eco-technology embracing sustainable practices and design. The Government must embrace sustainability in the design and delivery of the projects.  "For example investing in clean, sustainable fuels is not only beneficial for the environment but also for the economy," Lunn added. "We must ensure that our growth strategies include measures to reduce the environmental impact of our energy sources and mitigate the impact of such schemes on climate change."

Additionally, the EIA highlights the need to address the noise levels of aircraft on local communities. "The noise pollution from aircraft can have significant adverse effects on the health and well-being of local residents," Lunn stated. "It is imperative that we implement strategies to mitigate these impacts as part of our broader infrastructure development plans."

The EIA remains committed to working with policymakers, businesses, and communities to ensure that economic growth and environmental sustainability go hand in hand. "We believe that with the right policies and investments, the UK can achieve a future where economic prosperity and environmental protection are not mutually exclusive," concluded Lunn.

About the Environmental Industries Association:  The Environmental Industries Association (EIA) is dedicated to promoting sustainable practices and policies that protect the environment while supporting economic growth. Through advocacy, education, and collaboration, the EIA works to create a sustainable future for all and promotes the work of the Environmental Services and Technology Sector.

Link to Rachel Reeves MP, Chancellor announcement Reeves: I am going further and faster to kick start the economy - GOV.UK

EIA Highlights Impacts of Revised NPPF and Brownfield First Strategy

London, 13 December 2024 – Environmental Industries Association Highlights Impacts of Revised NPPF and Brownfield First Strategy

The Environmental Industries Association (EIA) today issued a statement on the significant impacts of the revised National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and the government's Brownfield First strategy. These changes are set to reshape the landscape of urban development and environmental management in the UK.

Responding to the revised document Peter Atchison, PAGeo and Chair of the EIA Remediation of Land and Groundwater working group said “The newly released NPPF offers a good insight into the government’s plans for sustainable development throughout the current parliament. Brownfield is mentioned in 11 sections of the document and as brownfield development is synonymous with sustainability then the governments intent is clear. “Brownfield first” meets many of the goals of the NPPF and EIA members are
pleased to see its inclusion in this important first stage document”.

Sunil Shah, Acclaro Advisory and Chair of the EIA Sustainable Buildings Working Group said “We welcome the proactive approach to both mitigation and adaptation to climate change within the NPPF, particularly with the avoidance of increased vulnerability.
Potential consequences for flood risk and cumulative impacts will be of particular concern. Additional demands for local plans to lay out additional requirements for the sustainability of buildings and supply of renewable energy should be extended to allow
areas to promote high levels of whole life energy and carbon reduction. However, there is uncertainty how the NPPF will help to achieve the new Government targets of 81%reduction by 2035”.

The revised NPPF introduces several key paras aimed at promoting sustainable development while protecting valuable green spaces. One of the most notable changes is the emphasis on the "Brownfield First" strategy, which prioritizes the redevelopment of
previously developed land over greenfield sites. This approach is designed to mitigate urban sprawl and preserve the countryside, aligning with the government's broader environmental goals.

Here’s a summary of the key points related to brownfield land, environmental design, and permitting from the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) December 2024:

Brownfield Land

  • Promotion of Brownfield Land: The NPPF emphasises the importance of making effective use of previously developed or 'brownfield' land. It encourages local planning authorities to prioritise brownfield sites for redevelopment to meet housing and other development needs.
  • Brownfield Registers: Local planning authorities are required to maintain brownfield land registers to identify suitable sites for residential development. This helps streamline the planning process and promotes the reuse of land that has
    been previously developed.
  • Support for Remediation: The framework supports the remediation of despoiled, degraded, derelict, contaminated, or unstable land to bring it back into productive use.

Environmental Design

  • Sustainable Development: The NPPF highlights the need for development to contribute to sustainable development goals, balancing economic, social, and environmental objectives.
  • Design Quality: High-quality design is fundamental, with an emphasis on creating beautiful, sustainable places. Developments should be visually attractive, function well, and add to the overall quality of the area.
  • Green Infrastructure: The integration of green infrastructure is encouraged to enhance biodiversity, support climate change adaptation, and improve the quality of life for residents.
  • Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: Developments should incorporate measures to mitigate and adapt to climate change, such as energy efficiency, renewable energy sources, and sustainable drainage systems.

Permitting

  • Decision-Making: Local planning authorities are encouraged to approach decisions on proposed developments positively and creatively, using tools like brownfield registers and permission in principle to facilitate development.
  • Pre-Application Engagement: Early engagement between developers, local authorities, and communities is promoted to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the planning application process.
  • Environmental Impact Assessments: The NPPF requires that developments likely to have significant environmental effects undergo thorough environmental impact assessments to ensure that potential impacts are fully understood and mitigated.
  • Conditions and Obligations: Planning conditions and obligations should be used to make otherwise unacceptable development acceptable. These should be necessary, relevant, and reasonable. EIA welcomes the retention of para 201
    which confirmed that the planning issues should not be revisited through the permitting regimes operated by pollution control authorities.

These points reflect the NPPF's commitment to promoting sustainable development, making effective use of land, and ensuring high-quality design while protecting and enhancing the natural environment.

Statements from Key Figures:
EIA wrote to Angela Rayner, Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Housing on Brownfield First and concerns over DoWCoP (version 3) and EIA is pleased that the Deputy Prime Minister has been a vocal advocate for the Brownfield First strategy. She emphasised the need to unlock potential housing sites on Brownfield site, stating, "There is lots of brownfield, lots of areas that need to be unlocked for development. Our priority is to build on brownfield sites first".

Matthew Pennycook, Minister of State for Housing and Planning, echoed these sentiments, highlighting the importance of protecting green spaces. "We have been clear that developers should first look to brownfield, or previously developed, land. That is essential to protect our most valuable countryside and agricultural land"

Conclusion:
The Environmental Industries Association supports the revised NPPF and the Brownfield First strategy as crucial steps towards sustainable urban development. By prioritising brownfield sites and streamlining the planning process, these measures promise to balance the need for new housing with the imperative to protect and enhance the environment. EIA will work with the Government to ensure that Brownfield First delivery is maintained and escalate any concerns from our Members.

For more information about the Environmental Industries Association, please visit www.EIAssociation.co.uk
Tags: #AngelaRayner #Labour #NPPF #SustainableDevelopment #Housing #Brownfield
#Permitting #Sustainability #BNG #ClimateChange #Planning #LocalGovernment
For more information, please contact:
Environmental Industries Association (EIA)
Membership@EIAssociation.co.uk
07562138034

Environmental Industries Association Commends Munira Wilson MP on PFAS Bill

PFAS word keywords cloud concept - Dangerous Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl substances used in products and materials due to their enhanced water-resistant properties

London, 4 December 2024 – The Environmental Industries Association (EIA) has expressed its support for the Poly and Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (Guidance) Bill introduced by Munira Wilson MP (Liberal Democrat) on 5th November 2024. The EIA, representing the majority of UK Environmental laboratories specialising in chemical analysis, applauds the increased parliamentary focus on PFAS.

In a letter to Munira Wilson MP, the EIA highlighted the contributions of its members to the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and the CIRIA Guidance on PFAS. The EIA, as the voice of the UK environmental services and technology sector, emphasised the importance of targeted regulations and bans on PFAS to mitigate their presence in human bodies and the environment.

The EIA’s working group on Remediation of Land and Groundwater and Environmental Analysis and Testing reviewed the Bill’s introduction and offered several observations:

  1. Health Impacts: The link between PFAS exposure and health issues such as decreased fertility, thyroid disease, miscarriage, reduced sperm quality, and cancer is still tentative. However, the accumulation of PFAS in the body and their excretion into the environment underscore the need for stringent regulations.
  2. Regulatory Challenges: The EIA noted the complexities of regulating PFAS as a chemical group due to their diverse properties and toxicity levels. A group-based approach, similar to that for petroleum hydrocarbons, could lead to either insufficient protection or overly stringent restrictions, with unintended consequences for public health and environmental safety.
  3. Replacement Issues: The introduction of new PFAS to replace banned ones presents additional challenges. The EIA advocates for better utilisation of the EU & UK REACH process to ensure the safety of new chemicals entering the market.

Grouping PFAS: The EIA critiqued the proposal by Ian Cousens, Tony Fletcher, and others to group PFAS by extreme persistence and ubiquitous presence, noting that not all PFAS are extremely persistent. The EIA supports a more nuanced approach to grouping PFAS to avoid regulatory loopholes.

Dr Ken Scally, Chair of the Environmental Analysis and Testing working group said he welcomed the introduction of the Private Members Bill by Munira Wilson MP representing the Twickenham Constituency. Dr Scally went on to say our members, representing the forefront of chemical analysis expertise in the UK, are committed to supporting evidence-based policy and regulation. We welcome the opportunity to work closely with policymakers to ensure that legislative efforts effectively balance environmental protection, public health, and scientific rigor.

The EIA celebrates the attention Munira Wilson’s Private Members Bill is generating and offers to provide leading national experts to advise on the Bill’s direction. This offer extends to Government Ministers to ensure comprehensive and effective legislation.

Environmental Industries Association
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.